Disclosure Letter

Warranty-mapped disclosure review for Acquisition of Oakbridge Software Ltd.

Review tools

AI-flagged issues mapped to SPA warranties. Each requires lawyer assessment.

Warranty 9.3 (IP ownership) — no disclosure

Critical

Sellers have made no disclosure against the IP ownership warranty despite the contractor IP gap identified in DD.

Owner: Rebecca Lang

Disclosure 4.2 is vague

High

'Various customer complaints from time to time' lacks specificity; supporting schedule absent.

Owner: Daniel Price

Inconsistent litigation disclosure

High

Disclosure 11.1 states no threatened claims; DD correspondence references threatened supplier claim.

Owner: Daniel Price

Missing supporting documents — disclosure 6.4

Medium

Referenced change of control consent letters not in the disclosure bundle.

Owner: Amara Wells

Disclosure suggests SPA protection needed

High

Disclosure of data protection gaps suggests a specific indemnity rather than general disclosure.

Owner: Rebecca Lang

Draft only — lawyer review required.